AGRIFULL 55 (DT) or SAME Condor 55 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Condor 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The AGRIFULL 55 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (2.8 L/min / 0.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGRIFULL 55 (DT) and SAME Condor 55 (DT), with the call on each
Question55 (DT)Condor 55 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 55”40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Condor 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 55 (DT) and the Condor 55 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 55 (DT) and the Condor 55 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?26.8 L/min (7.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 55”24.0 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”AheadThe AGRIFULL 55 (DT) has 12% more hydraulic flow (2.8 L/min / 0.7 gpm) than the SAME Condor 55 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,914 kg (4,220 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 55”1,580 kg (3,483 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 55 (DT): lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 55”); the Condor 55 (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,010 kg (4,431 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 55”1,980 kg (4,365 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 55 (DT) and the Condor 55 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 55”8 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 55 (DT) and the Condor 55 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 55”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 55”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 55”independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 55”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1987–19911982–1983Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL 55 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The AGRIFULL 55 (DT) has 12% more hydraulic flow (2.8 L/min / 0.7 gpm) than the SAME Condor 55 (DT) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The AGRIFULL 55 (DT) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Condor 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the 55 (DT): lift through the full range 610 mm behind the ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 55”); the Condor 55 (DT): lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources