AGRIFULL 350-Sprint (DT) or Massey Ferguson MF 142 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 350-Sprint (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 142 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The AGRIFULL 350-Sprint (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 25% (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGRIFULL 350-Sprint (DT) and Massey Ferguson MF 142 (A), with the call on each
Question350-Sprint (DT)MF 142 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?35.3 kW (47.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 Sprint”33.1 kW (44.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 142/A”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 350-Sprint (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 142 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 350-Sprint (DT) and the MF 142 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 350-Sprint (DT) and the MF 142 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?22.0 L/min (5.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 Sprint”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 142 (A).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,151 kg (2,538 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 Sprint”1,100 kg (2,425 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 142/A”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,400 kg (3,086 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 Sprint”1,575 kg (3,472 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 142/A”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Massey Ferguson 142 (A) is 13% heavier (175 kg / 386 lb) than the AGRIFULL 350-Sprint (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 142/A”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 350-Sprint (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?9Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 Sprint”8Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 142/A”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 350-Sprint (DT) and the MF 142 (A).
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 Sprint”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 142/A”AheadThe AGRIFULL 350-Sprint (DT) has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 142 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 Sprint”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 142/A”AheadThe Massey Ferguson 142 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL 350-Sprint (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?—independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 142/A”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 350-Sprint (DT).
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 Sprint”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 142/A”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1981–19861970–1979Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL 350-Sprint (DT) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson 142 (A) is 13% heavier (175 kg / 386 lb) than the AGRIFULL 350-Sprint (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The AGRIFULL 350-Sprint (DT) has 25% more top speed (5.0 km/h / 3.1 mph) than the Massey Ferguson 142 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson 142 (A) offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the AGRIFULL 350-Sprint (DT) does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The AGRIFULL 350-Sprint (DT) is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 350-Sprint (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 142 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources