AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) or SAME Condor 55 (DT)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Condor 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The SAME Condor 55 (DT) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 20% (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
  • The SAME Condor 55 (DT) suits road haulage better on this data: 150% (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) and SAME Condor 55 (DT), with the call on each
Question350-C (CL/Compact/S)Condor 55 (DT)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C”40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Condor 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) and the Condor 55 (DT).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) and the Condor 55 (DT).
Which pumps more oil for implements?20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C”24.0 L/min (6.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”AheadThe SAME Condor 55 (DT) has 20% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,580 kg (3,483 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 350-C (CL/Compact/S).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,440 kg (5,379 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C”1,980 kg (4,365 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) is 23% heavier (460 kg / 1,014 lb) than the SAME Condor 55 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) and the Condor 55 (DT).
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C”8 to 14Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) and the Condor 55 (DT).
Which is faster on the road?10 km/h (6.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”AheadThe SAME Condor 55 (DT) has 150% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C”independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?TracksTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Condor 55 (DT)”DifferDrive differs: the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) Tracks and the SAME Condor 55 (DT) Two-wheel or four-wheel drive — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1976–19771982–1983Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The SAME Condor 55 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The SAME Condor 55 (DT) has 20% more hydraulic flow (4.0 L/min / 1.1 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) is 23% heavier (460 kg / 1,014 lb) than the SAME Condor 55 (DT) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Condor 55 (DT) has 150% more top speed (15.0 km/h / 9.3 mph) than the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The SAME Condor 55 (DT) is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Drive differs: the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) Tracks and the SAME Condor 55 (DT) Two-wheel or four-wheel drive — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Condor 55 (DT) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources