AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) or Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 104 LS/LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 71% (14.2 L/min / 3.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA suits road haulage better on this data: 200% (20.0 km/h / 12.4 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 350-C (CL/Compact/S) | Farmer 104 LS/LSA | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 40.5 kW (54.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C” | 40.1 kW (53.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 104 LS/LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) and the Farmer 104 LS/LSA. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) and the Farmer 104 LS/LSA. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 20.0 L/min (5.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C” | 34.2 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA has 71% more hydraulic flow (14.2 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 2,110 kg (4,652 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 350-C (CL/Compact/S). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,440 kg (5,379 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C” | 2,515 kg (5,545 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) and the Farmer 104 LS/LSA. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 8Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C” | 13Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA has 63% more forward gears (5 gears) than the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) and the Farmer 104 LS/LSA. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 10 km/h (6.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C” | 30.0 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA” | AheadThe Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA has 200% more top speed (20.0 km/h / 12.4 mph) than the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C” | 1000Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA” | DifferPTO speeds differ: the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) 540 rpm and the Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA 1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement. |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Farmer 104 LS/LSA. |
| Which drives on both axles? | TracksTraktorenlexikon, “Agrifull 350 C” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA” | DifferDrive differs: the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) Tracks and the Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA 2WD / 4WD — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1976–1977 | 1978–1982 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA has 71% more hydraulic flow (14.2 L/min / 3.8 gpm) than the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA has 63% more forward gears (5 gears) than the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA has 200% more top speed (20.0 km/h / 12.4 mph) than the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- PTO speeds differ: the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) 540 rpm and the Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA 1000 rpm — each offers a speed the other does not; which matters depends on the implement.
- Drive differs: the AGRIFULL 350-C (CL/Compact/S) Tracks and the Fendt Farmer 104 LS/LSA 2WD / 4WD — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 350-C (CL/Compact/S) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Farmer 104 LS/LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources