Agco RT-95 vs Fendt Farmer 308 Ci

11 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2002–2004

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2003–2008

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the RT-95 and the Farmer 308 Ci → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

11 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco RT-95 and Fendt Farmer 308 Ci, field by field
Field	RT-95	Farmer 308 Ci	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	95.6 hp	97 hp	—
Engine declared	CUMMINS 6 BT-5.9	Deutz BF4M 2012 C	differs
Displacement declared	5.88 L	4.04 L	+46% RT-95
Maximum torque declared	325 lb·ft · 440 N·m	316 lb·ft · 428 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	—
Clutch declared	Pedal-operated wet VALEO multi-disc clutch, five discs with 250 mm diameter	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Open centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	—	Constant flow	—
Pump flow declared	29.4 gpm · 111.3 L/min	17.6 gpm · 66.5 L/min	+67% RT-95
Pressure declared	3,336 psi · 230 bar	2,611 psi · 180 bar	+28% RT-95
Three-point lift at ends declared	7,361 lb · 3,339 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540 rpm / 750 rpm / 1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	10,399 lb · 4,717 kg	8,488 lb · 3,850 kg	+23% RT-95
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	13,228 lb · 6,000 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	107.8 in · 2,739 mm	94.0 in · 2,388 mm	+15% RT-95
Length declared	173.0 in · 4,394 mm	157.5 in · 4,000 mm	+10% RT-95
Width declared	113.4 in · 2,880 mm	84.3 in · 2,140 mm	+35% RT-95
Height declared	88.0 in · 2,235 mm	106.7 in · 2,710 mm	+21% Farmer 308 Ci
Ground clearance declared	18.1 in · 460 mm	18.9 in · 480 mm	—
Turning radius, braked declared	—	12.5 ft · 3.80 m	—
Fuel tank declared	169.1 qt · 160.0 L	114.1 qt · 108 L	+48% RT-95

Source

Source