Agco RT 180 A vs Case-IH Puma 210

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2009–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the RT 180 A and the Puma 210 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco RT 180 A and Case-IH Puma 210, field by field
Field	RT 180 A	Puma 210	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	209.1 hp	210.1 hp	—
Engine declared	SISU-DIESEL 74 CTA-4V	IVECO-NEF 667 TA	differs
Displacement declared	7.37 L	6.73 L	+9% RT 180 A
Maximum torque declared	652 lb·ft · 884 N·m	622 lb·ft · 843 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	—	Electro-hydraulically operated wet Case-New-Holland multi-disc driving clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Closed centre	—
Hydraulic control declared	—	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	30.8 gpm · 116.6 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	3,336 psi · 230 bar	2,756 psi · 190 bar	+21% RT 180 A
Three-point lift at ends declared	14,546 lb · 6,598 kg	23,060 lb · 10,460 kg	+59% Puma 210
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	17,461 lb · 7,920 kg	18,078 lb · 8,200 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	118.0 in · 2,996 mm	113.5 in · 2,884 mm	—
Length declared	210.0 in · 5,334 mm	201.2 in · 5,110 mm	—
Width declared	79.1 in · 2,009 mm	84.1 in · 2,135 mm	+6% Puma 210
Height declared	122.0 in · 3,099 mm	120.1 in · 3,050 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	22.4 in · 570 mm	17.7 in · 450 mm	+27% RT 180 A
Fuel tank declared	399.4 qt · 378.0 L	433.2 qt · 410.0 L	+8% Puma 210

Source

Source