Agco RT-165 A or John Deere 8110 T?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-165 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8110 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Agco RT-165A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 33% (1,622 kg / 3,575 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Agco RT-165A suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | RT-165 A | 8110 T | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 144.9 kW (194.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 165 A” | 143.5 kW (192.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-165 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8110 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-165 A and the 8110 T. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-165 A and the 8110 T. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 116.6 L/min (30.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 165 A” | 120.4 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,598 kg (14,546 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 165 A” | 4,976 kg (10,971 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | AheadThe Agco RT-165A has 33% more lift (1,622 kg / 3,575 lb) than the John Deere 8110T (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,920 kg (17,461 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 165 A” | 10,727 kg (23,649 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 8110T is 35% heavier (2,807 kg / 6,188 lb) than the Agco RT-165A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 14,288 kg (31,500 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-165 A. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 165 A” | 16 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-165A is stepless (CVT) and the John Deere 8110T has 16 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-165 A and the 8110 T. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 165 A” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | AheadThe Agco RT-165A has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8110T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 165 A” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | AheadThe Agco RT-165A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 8110T does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 165 A” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 165 A” | TracksTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8110T” | DifferDrive differs: the Agco RT-165A 4WD and the John Deere 8110T Tracks — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2007–2011 | 2000–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-165A is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Agco RT-165A has 33% more lift (1,622 kg / 3,575 lb) than the John Deere 8110T (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 8110T is 35% heavier (2,807 kg / 6,188 lb) than the Agco RT-165A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-165A has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the John Deere 8110T (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-165A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 8110T does not (as stated by the sources).
- The Agco RT-165A is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-165A is stepless (CVT) and the John Deere 8110T has 16 forward gears — not called.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Drive differs: the Agco RT-165A 4WD and the John Deere 8110T Tracks — tracks and wheels are different kinds of running gear, not called.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-165 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8110 T has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources