Agco RT-165 A vs Case-IH Puma 195

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the RT-165 A and the Puma 195 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 7 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco RT-165 A and Case-IH Puma 195, field by field
Field	RT-165 A	Puma 195	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	194.3 hp	194.3 hp	—
Engine declared	SISU-DIESEL 74 CTA-4V	IVECO-N.E.F. 667 TA/EBC	differs
Displacement declared	7.37 L	6.73 L	+9% RT-165 A
Maximum torque declared	634 lb·ft · 859 N·m	607 lb·ft · 823 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	Closed centre	—
Hydraulic control declared	—	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	30.8 gpm · 116.6 L/min	35.6 gpm · 134.8 L/min	+16% Puma 195
Pressure declared	3,336 psi · 230 bar	2,756 psi · 190 bar	+21% RT-165 A
Three-point lift at ends declared	14,546 lb · 6,598 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	17,461 lb · 7,920 kg	17,637 lb · 8,000 kg	—
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	118.0 in · 2,996 mm	113.5 in · 2,884 mm	—
Length declared	210.0 in · 5,334 mm	201.2 in · 5,110 mm	—
Width declared	79.1 in · 2,009 mm	84.1 in · 2,135 mm	+6% Puma 195
Height declared	122.0 in · 3,099 mm	120.1 in · 3,050 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	22.4 in · 570 mm	17.7 in · 450 mm	+27% RT-165 A
Fuel tank declared	399.4 qt · 378.0 L	433.2 qt · 410.0 L	+8% Puma 195

Source

Source