Agco RT-155 A vs Case-IH Puma 180

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2006–2011

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2007–2011

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the RT-155 A and the Puma 180 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco RT-155 A and Case-IH Puma 180, field by field
Field	RT-155 A	Puma 180	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	179.6 hp	179.6 hp	—
Engine declared	SISU-DIESEL 66 CTA-4V	IVECO-NEF 667 TA	differs
Displacement declared	6.60 L	6.73 L	—
Maximum torque declared	—	592 lb·ft · 802 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Pedal-actuated electro-hydraulic Valeo multi-disc clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Closed centre	—
Hydraulic control declared	—	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	30.5 gpm · 115.6 L/min	35.9 gpm · 135.8 L/min	+17% Puma 180
Pressure declared	3,336 psi · 230 bar	2,756 psi · 190 bar	+21% RT-155 A
Three-point lift at ends declared	13,916 lb · 6,312 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540E/1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	16,854 lb · 7,645 kg	18,034 lb · 8,180 kg	+7% Puma 180
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	26,455 lb · 12,000 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	118.5 in · 3,011 mm	113.5 in · 2,884 mm	—
Length declared	196.0 in · 4,978 mm	193.5 in · 4,916 mm	—
Width declared	79.1 in · 2,009 mm	85.2 in · 2,165 mm	+8% Puma 180
Height declared	119.0 in · 3,023 mm	119.7 in · 3,040 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	22.4 in · 570 mm	15.7 in · 400 mm	+43% RT-155 A
Fuel tank declared	399.4 qt · 378.0 L	433.2 qt · 410.0 L	+8% Puma 180

Source

Source