Agco RT-150 or SAME Titan 150?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Agco RT-150 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 89% (53.6 L/min / 14.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco RT-150 and SAME Titan 150, with the call on each
QuestionRT-150Titan 150Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150”110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 150”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-150 and the Titan 150.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-150 and the Titan 150.
Which pumps more oil for implements?113.6 L/min (30.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150”60.0 L/min (15.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 150”AheadThe Agco RT-150 has 89% more hydraulic flow (53.6 L/min / 14.2 gpm) than the SAME Titan 150 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,169 kg (18,010 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150”—No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Titan 150.
Which is heavier, for traction?7,446 kg (16,416 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150”5,780 kg (12,743 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 150”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-150 is 29% heavier (1,666 kg / 3,673 lb) than the SAME Titan 150 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 150”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-150.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150”26 to 27 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 150”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-150 is stepless (CVT) and the SAME Titan 150 has 26 to 27 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-150 and the Titan 150.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 150”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 150”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150”independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 150”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 150”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–20051998–2001Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-150 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco RT-150 has 89% more hydraulic flow (53.6 L/min / 14.2 gpm) than the SAME Titan 150 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco RT-150 is 29% heavier (1,666 kg / 3,673 lb) than the SAME Titan 150 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco RT-150 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-150 is stepless (CVT) and the SAME Titan 150 has 26 to 27 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources