Agco RT-150 or Lamborghini 150 Racing?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 150 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Agco RT-150 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 89% (53.6 L/min / 14.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | RT-150 | 150 Racing | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150” | 110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 150 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-150 and the 150 Racing. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-150 and the 150 Racing. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 113.6 L/min (30.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150” | 60.0 L/min (15.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | AheadThe Agco RT-150 has 89% more hydraulic flow (53.6 L/min / 14.2 gpm) than the Lamborghini 150 Racing (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,169 kg (18,010 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150” | — | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 150 Racing. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,446 kg (16,416 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150” | 5,780 kg (12,743 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-150 is 29% heavier (1,666 kg / 3,673 lb) than the Lamborghini 150 Racing (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-150. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150” | 26 to 27 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-150 is stepless (CVT) and the Lamborghini 150 Racing has 26 to 27 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-150 and the 150 Racing. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 150” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 150 DT A Racing” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2004–2005 | 1995–2001 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-150 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Agco RT-150 has 89% more hydraulic flow (53.6 L/min / 14.2 gpm) than the Lamborghini 150 Racing (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-150 is 29% heavier (1,666 kg / 3,673 lb) than the Lamborghini 150 Racing (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-150 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-150 is stepless (CVT) and the Lamborghini 150 Racing has 26 to 27 forward gears — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-150 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 150 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources