Agco RT-145 or Lamborghini R.1506 DT?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1506 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Agco RT-145 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 73% (48.1 L/min / 12.7 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The Agco RT-145 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | RT-145 | R.1506 DT | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 108.9 kW (146.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 145” | 110.3 kW (147.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1506 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-145 and the R.1506 DT. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-145 and the R.1506 DT. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 114.3 L/min (30.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 145” | 66.2 L/min (17.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | AheadThe Agco RT-145 has 73% more hydraulic flow (48.1 L/min / 12.7 gpm) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,695 kg (14,760 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 145” | 6,680 kg (14,727 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,749 kg (14,879 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 145” | 5,695 kg (12,555 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-145 is 19% heavier (1,054 kg / 2,324 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-145 and the R.1506 DT. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 145” | 16 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-145 and the R.1506 DT. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 145” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | AheadThe Agco RT-145 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 145” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 145” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 145” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini R.1506 DT” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 2004– | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Agco RT-145 has 73% more hydraulic flow (48.1 L/min / 12.7 gpm) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-145 is 19% heavier (1,054 kg / 2,324 lb) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-145 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Lamborghini R.1506 DT (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the R.1506 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources