Agco RT-140 A or SAME Titan 165?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-140 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 165 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco RT-140 A and SAME Titan 165, with the call on each
QuestionRT-140 ATitan 165Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?122.8 kW (164.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”120.6 kW (161.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 165”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-140 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 165 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-140 A and the Titan 165.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-140 A and the Titan 165.
Which pumps more oil for implements?115.6 L/min (30.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Titan 165.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,312 kg (13,916 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 165”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the RT-140 A: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”); the Titan 165: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 165”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?7,395 kg (16,303 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”5,830 kg (12,853 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 165”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-140 A is 27% heavier (1,565 kg / 3,450 lb) than the SAME Titan 165 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 165”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-140 A.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”26 to 27 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 165”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-140 A is stepless (CVT) and the SAME Titan 165 has 26 to 27 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-140 A and the Titan 165.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 165”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 165”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 165”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 165”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2006–20111998–2001Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-140 A is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco RT-140 A is 27% heavier (1,565 kg / 3,450 lb) than the SAME Titan 165 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco RT-140 A is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-140 A is stepless (CVT) and the SAME Titan 165 has 26 to 27 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-140 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 165 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the RT-140 A: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”); the Titan 165: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 165”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources