10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneAgco RT-140 A2006–2011No measured PTO figureTractor twoCase-IH Puma 1652007–2011No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the RT-140 A and the Puma 165 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

10 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco RT-140 A and Case-IH Puma 165, field by field
FieldRT-140 APuma 165Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed164.7 hp164.7 hp—
Engine declaredSISU-DIESEL 66 CTA-4V——
Displacement declared6.60 L——
Maximum torque declared595 lb·ft · 807 N·m540 lb·ft · 731.8 N·m+10% RT-140 A
Transmission
Top speed declared24.9 mph · 40 km/h24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/hdiffers
Clutch declaredPedal operated electrohydraulic VALEO multi disc clutchelectrohydraulically operated wet Case-New Holland multi-plate driving clutchdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declaredClosed centreClosed centre—
Hydraulic control declaredLoad sensingLoad sensing—
Pump flow declared30.5 gpm · 115.6 L/min39.1 gpm · 148.1 L/min+28% Puma 165
Pressure declared3,336 psi · 230 bar2,756 psi · 190 bar+21% RT-140 A
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000 rpm540E/1000 rpmdiffers
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared16,303 lb · 7,395 kg17,891 lb · 8,115 kg+10% Puma 165
Maximum permissible mass declared—26,455 lb · 12,000 kg—
Wheelbase declared118.0 in · 2,996 mm113.5 in · 2,884 mm—
Length declared196.0 in · 4,978 mm193.5 in · 4,916 mm—
Width declared79.1–100.2 in · 2,009–2,545 mm85.2–114.2 in · 2,165–2,900 mmdiffers
Height, over the cab declared119.0 in · 3,023 mm119.7 in · 3,040 mm—
Ground clearance declared22.4 in · 570 mm18.7 in · 475 mm+20% RT-140 A
Fuel tank declared399.4 qt · 378.0 L433.2 qt · 410.0 L+8% Puma 165

Agco RT-140 A sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 140 A”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 100 A”

Case-IH Puma 165 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH Puma 165”
  • Source: OECD test report 2410, 2008