Agco RT-120 (Traktorenlexikon) or Massey Ferguson MF 6465 A?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6465 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco RT-120 (Traktorenlexikon) and Massey Ferguson MF 6465 A, with the call on each
QuestionRT-120MF 6465 ACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6465”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6465 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-120 and the MF 6465 A.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-120 and the MF 6465 A.
Which pumps more oil for implements?127.4 L/min (33.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”—No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 6465 A.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,951 kg (10,915 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”4,730 kg (10,428 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6465”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the RT-120: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”); the MF 6465 A: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6465”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,905 kg (15,223 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”4,970 kg (10,957 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6465”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-120 is 39% heavier (1,935 kg / 4,266 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6465A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—8,800 kg (19,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6465”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-120.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”24 to 32 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6465”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-120 is stepless (CVT) and the Massey Ferguson 6465A has 24 to 32 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-120 and the MF 6465 A.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6465”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6465”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6465”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”; OECD test report 2235, 2005Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6465”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–20052003–2012EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco RT-120 is 39% heavier (1,935 kg / 4,266 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6465A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-120 is stepless (CVT) and the Massey Ferguson 6465A has 24 to 32 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6465 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the RT-120: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”); the MF 6465 A: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6465”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources