Agco RT-120 (Traktorenlexikon) or Fendt 413 Vario?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 413 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco RT-120 (Traktorenlexikon) and Fendt 413 Vario, with the call on each
QuestionRT-120413 VarioCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”88 kW (118 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 413 Vario”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 413 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-120 and the 413 Vario.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-120 and the 413 Vario.
Which pumps more oil for implements?127.4 L/min (33.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 413 Vario.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,951 kg (10,915 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”7,597 kg (16,748 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 413 Vario”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the RT-120: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”); the 413 Vario: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 413 Vario”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,905 kg (15,223 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”5,420 kg (11,949 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 413 Vario”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-120 is 27% heavier (1,485 kg / 3,274 lb) than the Fendt 413 Vario (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-120 and the 413 Vario.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 413 Vario”EvenEven on gears: every machine is stepless.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 413 Vario”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-120.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 413 Vario”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 413 Vario”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 413 Vario.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt 413 Vario”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–20052006–2013EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco RT-120 is 27% heavier (1,485 kg / 3,274 lb) than the Fendt 413 Vario (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on gears: every machine is stepless.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 413 Vario has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the RT-120: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”); the 413 Vario: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 413 Vario”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources