Agco RT-120 A or SAME Titan 145?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-120 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Agco RT-120 A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 73% (43.3 L/min / 11.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco RT-120 A and SAME Titan 145, with the call on each
QuestionRT-120 ATitan 145Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?105.2 kW (141.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120 A”106.6 kW (143.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-120 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-120 A and the Titan 145.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-120 A and the Titan 145.
Which pumps more oil for implements?102.8 L/min (27.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120 A”59.5 L/min (15.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145”AheadThe Agco RT-120 A has 73% more hydraulic flow (43.3 L/min / 11.4 gpm) than the SAME Titan 145 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,000 kg (15,432 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the RT-120 A.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,033 kg (13,300 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120 A”5,750 kg (12,677 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-120 A.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120 A”26 to 27 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-120 A is stepless (CVT) and the SAME Titan 145 has 26 to 27 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-120 A and the Titan 145.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120 A”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120 A”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120 A”independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120 A”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Titan 145”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2006–20111995–1998Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-120 A is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco RT-120 A has 73% more hydraulic flow (43.3 L/min / 11.4 gpm) than the SAME Titan 145 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco RT-120 A is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-120 A is stepless (CVT) and the SAME Titan 145 has 26 to 27 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-120 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Titan 145 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources