Agco RT-115 (Traktorenlexikon) or Fiat F-120 DT?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the F-120 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Agco RT-115 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 88% (49.9 L/min / 13.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | RT-115 | F-120 DT | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 86.8 kW (116.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 115” | 86.8 kW (116.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the F-120 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-115 and the F-120 DT. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-115 and the F-120 DT. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 106.4 L/min (28.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 115” | 56.5 L/min (14.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT” | AheadThe Agco RT-115 has 88% more hydraulic flow (49.9 L/min / 13.2 gpm) than the Fiat F-120 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 4,282 kg (9,440 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 115” | 4,440 kg (9,789 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the RT-115: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 115”); the F-120 DT: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,930 kg (13,073 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 115” | 5,370 kg (11,839 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-115 is 10% heavier (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the Fiat F-120 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-115. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 32Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 115” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-115 and the F-120 DT. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 115” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 115” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 115” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 115”; OECD test report 2000, 2002 | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 1990–1993 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-115 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Agco RT-115 has 88% more hydraulic flow (49.9 L/min / 13.2 gpm) than the Fiat F-120 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-115 is 10% heavier (560 kg / 1,235 lb) than the Fiat F-120 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-115 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the F-120 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the RT-115: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 115”); the F-120 DT: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fiatagri F120 DT”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources