Agco RT-110 A or Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-110 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 135 DT B Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Agco RT-110A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 79% (45.3 L/min / 12.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | RT-110 A | 135 DT B Formula | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 97.8 kW (131.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 110 A” | 97.1 kW (130.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-110 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 135 DT B Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-110 A and the 135 DT B Formula. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-110 A and the 135 DT B Formula. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 102.8 L/min (27.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 110 A” | 57.5 L/min (15.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula” | AheadThe Agco RT-110A has 79% more hydraulic flow (45.3 L/min / 12.0 gpm) than the Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,741 kg (12,657 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 110 A” | 6,200 kg (13,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,534 kg (12,200 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 110 A” | 4,880 kg (10,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-110A is 13% heavier (654 kg / 1,442 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-110 A. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 110 A” | 24 to 72 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula” | DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-110A is stepless (CVT) and the Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula has 24 to 72 forward gears — not called. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-110 A and the 135 DT B Formula. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 110 A” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 110 A” | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 110 A” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 110 A”; OECD test report 2411, 2008 | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2007–2011 | 1996– | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-110A is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Agco RT-110A has 79% more hydraulic flow (45.3 L/min / 12.0 gpm) than the Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-110A is 13% heavier (654 kg / 1,442 lb) than the Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Agco RT-110A is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-110A is stepless (CVT) and the Lamborghini 135 DT B Formula has 24 to 72 forward gears — not called.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-110 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 135 DT B Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources