Agco RT-100 (Traktorenlexikon) or SAME Silver 100.4 DT?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Silver 100.4 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Agco RT-100 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 127% (71.3 L/min / 18.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco RT-100 (Traktorenlexikon) and SAME Silver 100.4 DT, with the call on each
QuestionRT-100Silver 100.4 DTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?73.5 kW (98.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 100”73.5 kW (98.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Silver 100.4”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Silver 100.4 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-100 and the Silver 100.4 DT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-100 and the Silver 100.4 DT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?127.4 L/min (33.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 100”56.1 L/min (14.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Silver 100.4”AheadThe Agco RT-100 has 127% more hydraulic flow (71.3 L/min / 18.8 gpm) than the SAME Silver 100.4 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the RT-100 and the Silver 100.4 DT.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,905 kg (15,223 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 100”4,315 kg (9,513 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Silver 100.4”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-100 is 60% heavier (2,590 kg / 5,710 lb) than the SAME Silver 100.4 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Silver 100.4”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-100.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 100”15 to 60 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Silver 100.4”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-100 is stepless (CVT) and the SAME Silver 100.4 DT has 15 to 60 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-100 and the Silver 100.4 DT.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 100”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Silver 100.4”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 100”540/540E/1000E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Silver 100.4”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Silver 100.4”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the RT-100.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 100”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “SAME Silver 100.4”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–20051995–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-100 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco RT-100 has 127% more hydraulic flow (71.3 L/min / 18.8 gpm) than the SAME Silver 100.4 DT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco RT-100 is 60% heavier (2,590 kg / 5,710 lb) than the SAME Silver 100.4 DT (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco RT-100 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-100 is stepless (CVT) and the SAME Silver 100.4 DT has 15 to 60 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Silver 100.4 DT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources