Agco LT-95 A or Massey Ferguson MF 6270 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the LT-95 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6270 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Massey Ferguson 6270 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 74% (40.8 L/min / 10.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | LT-95 A | MF 6270 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 84.6 kW (113.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 95 A” | 84.6 kW (113.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the LT-95 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6270 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the LT-95 A and the MF 6270 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the LT-95 A and the MF 6270 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 54.9 L/min (14.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 95 A” | 95.7 L/min (25.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson 6270 (A) has 74% more hydraulic flow (40.8 L/min / 10.8 gpm) than the Agco LT-95A (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 4,250 kg (9,370 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the LT-95 A. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,021 kg (11,069 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 95 A” | 4,355 kg (9,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco LT-95A is 15% heavier (666 kg / 1,468 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6270 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,800 kg (19,401 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the LT-95 A. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 95 A” | 16 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the LT-95 A and the MF 6270 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 95 A” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 95 A” | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 95 A” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 95 A” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6270” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2008–2010 | 1999–2003 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco LT-95A is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Massey Ferguson 6270 (A) has 74% more hydraulic flow (40.8 L/min / 10.8 gpm) than the Agco LT-95A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Agco LT-95A is 15% heavier (666 kg / 1,468 lb) than the Massey Ferguson 6270 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Agco LT-95A is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the LT-95 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6270 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources