Agco LT-85 A (Traktorenlexikon) or ZETOR 10641?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the LT-85 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco LT-85 A (Traktorenlexikon) and ZETOR 10641, with the call on each
QuestionLT-85 A10641Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the LT-85 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the LT-85 A and the 10641.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the LT-85 A and the 10641.
Which pumps more oil for implements?61.3 L/min (16.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?—5,782 kg (12,747 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the LT-85 A.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,810 kg (10,604 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”4,075 kg (8,984 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco LT-85A is 18% heavier (735 kg / 1,620 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—6,700 kg (14,771 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the LT-85 A.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”24Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”AheadThe ZETOR 10641 has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Agco LT-85A (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the LT-85 A and the 10641.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”; OECD test report 2514, 20094WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 10641 1999-2002)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2008–20101999–2002Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco LT-85A is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco LT-85A is 18% heavier (735 kg / 1,620 lb) than the ZETOR 10641 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 10641 has 50% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Agco LT-85A (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco LT-85A is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the LT-85 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 10641 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources