Agco LT-85 A (Traktorenlexikon) or Massey Ferguson MF 5450 A?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the LT-85 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 5450 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco LT-85 A (Traktorenlexikon) and Massey Ferguson MF 5450 A, with the call on each
QuestionLT-85 AMF 5450 ACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”77.3 kW (103.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5450”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the LT-85 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 5450 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the LT-85 A and the MF 5450 A.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the LT-85 A and the MF 5450 A.
Which pumps more oil for implements?61.3 L/min (16.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 5450 A.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5450”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the LT-85 A.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,810 kg (10,604 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”3,900 kg (8,598 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5450”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco LT-85 A is 23% heavier (910 kg / 2,006 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5450 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5450”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the LT-85 A.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”16Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5450”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the LT-85 A and the MF 5450 A.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5450”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5450”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 5450 A.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”; OECD test report 2514, 20094WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 5450”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2008–20102011–2013EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco LT-85 A is 23% heavier (910 kg / 2,006 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 5450 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the LT-85 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 5450 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources