Agco LT-85 A (Traktorenlexikon) or Hürlimann 910.6 XT?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the LT-85 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 910.6 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Agco LT-85A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 50% (20.3 L/min / 5.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco LT-85 A (Traktorenlexikon) and Hürlimann 910.6 XT, with the call on each
QuestionLT-85 A910.6 XTCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the LT-85 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 910.6 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the LT-85 A and the 910.6 XT.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the LT-85 A and the 910.6 XT.
Which pumps more oil for implements?61.3 L/min (16.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”41.0 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”AheadThe Agco LT-85A has 50% more hydraulic flow (20.3 L/min / 5.4 gpm) than the Hürlimann 910.6 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?——No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the LT-85 A and the 910.6 XT.
Which is heavier, for traction?4,810 kg (10,604 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”4,550 kg (10,031 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?——No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the LT-85 A and the 910.6 XT.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”20 to 45Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the LT-85 A and the 910.6 XT.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”—No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 910.6 XT.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO LT 85 A”; OECD test report 2514, 20094WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XT 910.6”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2008–20101995–2004Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco LT-85A is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco LT-85A has 50% more hydraulic flow (20.3 L/min / 5.4 gpm) than the Hürlimann 910.6 XT (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco LT-85A is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the LT-85 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 910.6 XT has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources