Agco GT-65 vs URSUS 5312/5314

10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Agco GT-65

2004–2007

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

URSUS 5312/5314

1993–2003

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the GT-65 and the 5312/5314 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

Field by field

10 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco GT-65 and URSUS 5312/5314, field by field
FieldGT-655312/5314Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed70.0 hp70.0 hp
Engine declaredSAME-DEUTZ-FAHR 1000.4 A 5Ursus 4390differs
Displacement declared4.00 L3.87 L
Maximum torque declared170 lb·ft · 230 N·m197 lb·ft · 267 N·m+16% 5312/5314
Transmission
Top speed declared24.9 mph · 40 km/h15.5–18.6 mph · 25–30 km/hdiffers
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared14.0 gpm · 53.0 L/min16.2 gpm · 61.3 L/min+16% 5312/5314
Pressure declared3,118 psi · 215 bar3,002–3,481 psi · 207–240 bardiffers
Three-point lift at ends declared5,732 lb · 2,600 kg
Rear PTO speeds declared540/1000 rpm540/1000 rpm
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared5,862 lb · 2,659 kg7,011 lb · 3,180 kg+20% 5312/5314
Wheelbase declared88.0 in · 2,235 mm87.5 in · 2,223 mm
Length declared151.6 in · 3,851 mm148.4 in · 3,770 mm
Width declared76.7 in · 1,948 mm79.1 in · 2,010 mm
Height declared106.0 in · 2,692 mm100.0 in · 2,540 mm+6% GT-65
Ground clearance declared17.5 in · 445 mm13.4 in · 340 mm+31% GT-65
Turning radius, braked declared10.0 ft · 3.06 m12.8 ft · 3.90 m+27% 5312/5314
Fuel tank declared94.8 qt · 89.7 L84.5 qt · 80.0 L+12% GT-65

Agco GT-65 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 65”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Dorado 70”

URSUS 5312/5314 sources

Source
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5312/5314”
  • Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 4514”