Agco GT-65 vs Massey Ferguson MF 6110 (A)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2004–2007

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1995–1997

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the GT-65 and the MF 6110 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco GT-65 and Massey Ferguson MF 6110 (A), field by field
Field	GT-65	MF 6110 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	70.0 hp	70.1 hp	—
Engine declared	SAME-DEUTZ-FAHR 1000.4 A 5	Perkins A 4.236	differs
Displacement declared	4.00 L	3.87 L	—
Maximum torque declared	170 lb·ft · 230 N·m	203 lb·ft · 275 N·m	+20% MF 6110 (A)
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	—	Pedal operated dry air-cooled VALEO single disc clutch as driving clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	14.0 gpm · 53.0 L/min	13.6 gpm · 51.5 L/min	—
Pressure declared	3,118 psi · 215 bar	2,727 psi · 188 bar	+14% GT-65
Three-point lift at ends declared	—	7,385 lb · 3,350 kg	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540/1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,862 lb · 2,659 kg	7,926 lb · 3,595 kg	+35% MF 6110 (A)
Wheelbase declared	88.0 in · 2,235 mm	93.3 in · 2,371 mm	+6% MF 6110 (A)
Length declared	151.6 in · 3,851 mm	158.2 in · 4,019 mm	—
Width declared	76.7 in · 1,948 mm	72.8 in · 1,850 mm	+5% GT-65
Height declared	106.0 in · 2,692 mm	104.5 in · 2,654 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	17.5 in · 445 mm	14.1 in · 357 mm	+25% GT-65
Turning radius, braked declared	10.0 ft · 3.06 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	94.8 qt · 89.7 L	137.4 qt · 130.0 L	+45% MF 6110 (A)

Source

Source