Agco GT-65 vs Fendt 370 GT
12 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the GT-65 and the 370 GT → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
12 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | GT-65 | 370 GT | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 70.0 hp | 70 hp | — |
| Engine declared | SAME-DEUTZ-FAHR 1000.4 A 5 | KHD F4 L 913 H | differs |
| Displacement declared | 4.00 L | 3.77 L | +6% GT-65 |
| Maximum torque declared | 170 lb·ft · 230 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | 24.9 mph · 40 km/h | — |
| Clutch declared | — | Dual dry clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 14.0 gpm · 53.0 L/min | 10.6 gpm · 40.0 L/min | +33% GT-65 |
| Pressure declared | 3,118 psi · 215 bar | 2,611 psi · 180 bar | +19% GT-65 |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 540/1000 rpm | 540/750/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 5,862 lb · 2,659 kg | 7,915 lb · 3,590 kg | +35% 370 GT |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | — | 11,662 lb · 5,290 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 88.0 in · 2,235 mm | 126.4 in · 3,210 mm | +44% 370 GT |
| Length declared | 151.6 in · 3,851 mm | 182.3 in · 4,630 mm | +20% 370 GT |
| Width declared | 76.7 in · 1,948 mm | 72.8 in · 1,850 mm | +5% GT-65 |
| Height declared | 106.0 in · 2,692 mm | 106.7 in · 2,710 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 17.5 in · 445 mm | 19.7 in · 500 mm | +12% 370 GT |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 10.0 ft · 3.06 m | 13.5 ft · 4.10 m | +34% 370 GT |
| Fuel tank declared | 94.8 qt · 89.7 L | 84.5 qt · 80 L | +12% GT-65 |
Agco GT-65 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 65”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “SAME Dorado 70”
Fendt 370 GT sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt F 370 GT”