10 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor oneAgco GT-652004–2007No measured PTO figureTractor twoDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 80 (New)2004No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the GT-65 and the Agrotron 80 (New) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

10 material differences · 3 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco GT-65 and Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 80 (New), field by field
Field	GT-65	Agrotron 80 (New)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	70.0 hp	70.1 hp	—
Engine declared	SAME-DEUTZ-FAHR 1000.4 A 5	Deutz BF4M 2012 E	differs
Displacement declared	4.00 L	4.04 L	—
Maximum torque declared	170 lb·ft · 230 N·m	240 lb·ft · 325 N·m	+41% Agrotron 80 (New)
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	—	Electrohydraulically operated wet ZF multi-disc clutch	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Open centre	—
Pump flow declared	14.0 gpm · 53.0 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	3,118 psi · 215 bar	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540 rpm / 1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	5,862 lb · 2,659 kg	9,590 lb · 4,350 kg	+64% Agrotron 80 (New)
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	14,330 lb · 6,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	88.0 in · 2,235 mm	95.2 in · 2,419 mm	+8% Agrotron 80 (New)
Length declared	151.6 in · 3,851 mm	163.0 in · 4,139 mm	+7% Agrotron 80 (New)
Width declared	76.7–88.9 in · 1,948–2,258 mm	88.8 in · 2,256 mm	differs
Height, over the cab declared	106.0 in · 2,692 mm	109.0 in · 2,769 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	17.5 in · 445 mm	18.7 in · 475 mm	+7% Agrotron 80 (New)
Turning radius, braked declared	10.0 ft · 3.06 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	94.8 qt · 89.7 L	190.2 qt · 180 L	+101% Agrotron 80 (New)

Source

Source