Agco GT-55 or Renault 70-14 LB?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the GT-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-14 LB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Agco GT-55 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | GT-55 | 70-14 LB | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the GT-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-14 LB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the GT-55 and the 70-14 LB. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the GT-55 and the 70-14 LB. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 47.3 L/min (12.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 37.2 L/min (9.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242” | AheadThe Agco GT-55 has 27% more hydraulic flow (10.1 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the Renault 70-14 LB (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,725 kg (3,803 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 3,480 kg (7,672 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242” | AheadThe Renault 70-14 LB has 102% more lift (1,755 kg / 3,869 lb) than the Agco GT-55 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,499 kg (5,509 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 2,500 kg (5,512 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 4,700 kg (10,362 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the GT-55. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 12Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242” | AheadThe Agco GT-55 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Renault 70-14 LB (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the GT-55 and the 70-14 LB. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242” | AheadThe Agco GT-55 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Renault 70-14 LB (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 70-14 LB. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 70-14 LB R3242” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2004–2007 | 1991–1999 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco GT-55 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Agco GT-55 has 27% more hydraulic flow (10.1 L/min / 2.7 gpm) than the Renault 70-14 LB (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Renault 70-14 LB has 102% more lift (1,755 kg / 3,869 lb) than the Agco GT-55 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Agco GT-55 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Renault 70-14 LB (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Agco GT-55 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Renault 70-14 LB (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Agco GT-55 is newer: production began 13 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the GT-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 70-14 LB has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources