Agco GT-55 or John Deere 5325 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the GT-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5325 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The John Deere 5325 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 13% (6.1 L/min / 1.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 23% (400 kg / 882 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | GT-55 | 5325 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5325” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the GT-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5325 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the GT-55 and the 5325 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the GT-55 and the 5325 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 47.3 L/min (12.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 53.4 L/min (14.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5325” | AheadThe John Deere 5325 (A) has 13% more hydraulic flow (6.1 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Agco GT-55 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 1,725 kg (3,803 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 2,125 kg (4,685 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5325” | AheadThe John Deere 5325 (A) has 23% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the Agco GT-55 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 2,499 kg (5,509 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 2,719 kg (5,994 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5325” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the GT-55 and the 5325 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 9 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5325” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the GT-55 and the 5325 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5325” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5325” | AheadThe Agco GT-55 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 5325 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5325” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5325” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2004–2007 | 2005–2008 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 5325 (A) has 13% more hydraulic flow (6.1 L/min / 1.6 gpm) than the Agco GT-55 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The John Deere 5325 (A) has 23% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the Agco GT-55 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Agco GT-55 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 5325 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the GT-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5325 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources