Agco GT-55 or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the GT-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 4.70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 40% (18.7 L/min / 4.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 261% (4,495 kg / 9,910 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco GT-55 and Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70, with the call on each
QuestionGT-55Agrotron 4.70Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?49.3 kW (66.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55”50.7 kW (68.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the GT-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 4.70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the GT-55 and the Agrotron 4.70.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the GT-55 and the Agrotron 4.70.
Which pumps more oil for implements?47.3 L/min (12.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55”66.0 L/min (17.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 40% more hydraulic flow (18.7 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the Agco GT-55 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,725 kg (3,803 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55”6,220 kg (13,713 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 261% more lift (4,495 kg / 9,910 lb) than the Agco GT-55 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,499 kg (5,509 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55”3,890 kg (8,576 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 is 56% heavier (1,391 kg / 3,067 lb) than the Agco GT-55 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the GT-55.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55”21 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 31% more forward gears (5 gears) than the Agco GT-55 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the GT-55 and the Agrotron 4.70.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 55”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–20071995–1997Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco GT-55 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 40% more hydraulic flow (18.7 L/min / 4.9 gpm) than the Agco GT-55 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 261% more lift (4,495 kg / 9,910 lb) than the Agco GT-55 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 is 56% heavier (1,391 kg / 3,067 lb) than the Agco GT-55 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 4.70 has 31% more forward gears (5 gears) than the Agco GT-55 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco GT-55 is newer: production began 9 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the GT-55 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 4.70 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources