Agco GT-45 or Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the GT-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XE 55 Tradition has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco GT-45 and Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition, with the call on each
QuestionGT-45XE 55 TraditionCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”38.2 kW (51.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the GT-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XE 55 Tradition has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the GT-45 and the XE 55 Tradition.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the GT-45 and the XE 55 Tradition.
Which pumps more oil for implements?85.9 L/min (22.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the XE 55 Tradition.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,597 kg (3,521 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the GT-45: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”); the XE 55 Tradition: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?2,419 kg (5,333 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”2,180 kg (4,806 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco GT-45 is 11% heavier (239 kg / 527 lb) than the Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the GT-45 and the XE 55 Tradition.
Which has the wider choice of gears?16Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”20 to 30Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the GT-45 and the XE 55 Tradition.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”540/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition”AheadThe Agco GT-45 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–20072005–2009EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco GT-45 is 11% heavier (239 kg / 527 lb) than the Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco GT-45 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition does not (as stated by the sources).
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the GT-45 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the XE 55 Tradition has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the GT-45: lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO GT 45”); the XE 55 Tradition: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XE 55 Tradition”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources