Agco DT-225 or Renault Atles 926 RZ?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-225 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 926 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Renault Atles 926 RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 37% (3,310 kg / 7,297 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | DT-225 | Atles 926 RZ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 167.7 kW (224.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225” | 166.3 kW (223.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-225 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 926 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-225 and the Atles 926 RZ. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-225 and the Atles 926 RZ. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 113.2 L/min (29.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Atles 926 RZ. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,940 kg (19,709 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225” | 12,250 kg (27,007 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | AheadThe Renault Atles 926 RZ has 37% more lift (3,310 kg / 7,297 lb) than the Agco DT-225 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,956 kg (19,745 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225” | 9,690 kg (21,363 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 12,350 kg (27,227 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the DT-225. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225” | 18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-225 and the Atles 926 RZ. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225” | 540/1000 rpmOECD test report 2154, 2004 | AheadThe Renault Atles 926 RZ offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Agco DT-225 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the DT-225. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 225” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Atles 926 RZ”; OECD test report 2154, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 2001–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Atles 926 RZ has 37% more lift (3,310 kg / 7,297 lb) than the Agco DT-225 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Atles 926 RZ offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Agco DT-225 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-225 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Atles 926 RZ has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources