Agco DT-220 A or Lamborghini 260 Victory?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-220 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 260 Victory has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco DT-220 A and Lamborghini 260 Victory, with the call on each
QuestionDT-220 A260 VictoryCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?191.2 kW (256.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”191.2 kW (256.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-220 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 260 Victory has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-220 A and the 260 Victory.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-220 A and the 260 Victory.
Which pumps more oil for implements?139.8 L/min (36.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”120.3 L/min (31.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”AheadThe Agco DT-220 A has 16% more hydraulic flow (19.5 L/min / 5.2 gpm) than the Lamborghini 260 Victory (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,644 kg (14,648 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”AheadThe Lamborghini 260 Victory has 58% more lift (3,856 kg / 8,501 lb) than the Agco DT-220 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?9,240 kg (20,371 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”8,450 kg (18,629 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”40 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-220 A is stepless (CVT) and the Lamborghini 260 Victory has 40 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-220 A.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”AheadThe Agco DT-220 A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Lamborghini 260 Victory does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 220 A”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini Victory 260”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2005–20081999–2001Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-220 A is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco DT-220 A has 16% more hydraulic flow (19.5 L/min / 5.2 gpm) than the Lamborghini 260 Victory (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 260 Victory has 58% more lift (3,856 kg / 8,501 lb) than the Agco DT-220 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco DT-220 A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Lamborghini 260 Victory does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Agco DT-220 A is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-220 A is stepless (CVT) and the Lamborghini 260 Victory has 40 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-220 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 260 Victory has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources