Agco DT-205 B or Steyr-Case 9250 a?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-205 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9250 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Steyr-Case 9250a suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 18% (16.8 L/min / 4.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco DT-205 B and Steyr-Case 9250 a, with the call on each
QuestionDT-205 B9250 aCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?176.5 kW (236.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”175.9 kW (235.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-205 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9250 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-205 B and the 9250 a.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-205 B and the 9250 a.
Which pumps more oil for implements?95.6 L/min (25.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”112.4 L/min (29.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”AheadThe Steyr-Case 9250a has 18% more hydraulic flow (16.8 L/min / 4.4 gpm) than the Agco DT-205B (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?11,156 kg (24,595 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”5,050 kg (11,133 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the DT-205 B: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”); the 9250 a: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?11,720 kg (25,838 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”8,242 kg (18,170 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-205B is 42% heavier (3,478 kg / 7,668 lb) than the Steyr-Case 9250a (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the DT-205 B.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-205B is stepless (CVT) and the Steyr-Case 9250a has 24 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?—YesTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-205 B.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”AheadThe Steyr-Case 9250a offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Agco DT-205B does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2009–20101997–1999Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-205B is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Steyr-Case 9250a has 18% more hydraulic flow (16.8 L/min / 4.4 gpm) than the Agco DT-205B (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco DT-205B is 42% heavier (3,478 kg / 7,668 lb) than the Steyr-Case 9250a (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Steyr-Case 9250a offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Agco DT-205B does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Agco DT-205B is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-205B is stepless (CVT) and the Steyr-Case 9250a has 24 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-205 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9250 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the DT-205 B: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”); the 9250 a: lift through the full range at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9250 a”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources