Agco DT-205 B or Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-205 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7240 PRO/8940 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco DT-205 B and Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940, with the call on each
QuestionDT-205 B7240 PRO/8940Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?176.5 kW (236.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”175.8 kW (235.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-205 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7240 PRO/8940 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-205 B and the 7240 PRO/8940.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-205 B and the 7240 PRO/8940.
Which pumps more oil for implements?95.6 L/min (25.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”112.4 L/min (29.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”AheadThe Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 has 18% more hydraulic flow (16.8 L/min / 4.4 gpm) than the Agco DT-205B (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?11,156 kg (24,595 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”7,148 kg (15,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”AheadThe Agco DT-205B has 56% more lift (4,008 kg / 8,836 lb) than the Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?11,720 kg (25,838 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”8,242 kg (18,170 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-205B is 42% heavier (3,478 kg / 7,668 lb) than the Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—11,575 kg (25,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the DT-205 B.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-205B is stepless (CVT) and the Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 has 24 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?—YesTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-205 B.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2009–20101997–1999Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-205B is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 has 18% more hydraulic flow (16.8 L/min / 4.4 gpm) than the Agco DT-205B (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco DT-205B has 56% more lift (4,008 kg / 8,836 lb) than the Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco DT-205B is 42% heavier (3,478 kg / 7,668 lb) than the Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco DT-205B is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco DT-205B is stepless (CVT) and the Case-IH 7240 PRO/8940 has 24 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-205 B has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 7240 PRO/8940 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources