Agco DT-200 or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 200 (New) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 12% (1,060 kg / 2,337 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | DT-200 | Agrotron 200 (New) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 149.3 kW (200.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200” | 150.9 kW (202.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New)” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 200 (New) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-200 and the Agrotron 200 (New). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-200 and the Agrotron 200 (New). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 110.2 L/min (29.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200” | 112.4 L/min (29.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New)” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,940 kg (19,709 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200” | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New)” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New) has 12% more lift (1,060 kg / 2,337 lb) than the Agco DT-200 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,904 kg (19,630 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200” | 7,270 kg (16,028 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-200 is 22% heavier (1,634 kg / 3,602 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New)” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the DT-200. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200” | 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New)” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-200 and the Agrotron 200 (New). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200” | 540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New)” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Agco DT-200 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New)” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 200” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 2004–2007 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New) has 12% more lift (1,060 kg / 2,337 lb) than the Agco DT-200 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Agco DT-200 is 22% heavier (1,634 kg / 3,602 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 (New) offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the Agco DT-200 does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-200 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 200 (New) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources