Agco DT-180 A or Agco RT 180 A?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the RT 180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Agco DT-180 A suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 21% (24.9 L/min / 6.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | DT-180 A | RT 180 A | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 158.1 kW (212.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A” | 155.9 kW (209.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the RT 180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-180 A and the RT 180 A. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-180 A and the RT 180 A. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 141.5 L/min (37.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A” | 116.6 L/min (30.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | AheadThe Agco DT-180 A has 21% more hydraulic flow (24.9 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Agco RT 180 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 6,644 kg (14,648 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A” | 6,598 kg (14,546 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 9,030 kg (19,908 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A” | 7,920 kg (17,461 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-180 A is 14% heavier (1,110 kg / 2,447 lb) than the Agco RT 180 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 14,000 kg (30,865 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT 180 A. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A” | Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | EvenEven on gears: every machine is stepless. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-180 A and the RT 180 A. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/540E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the DT-180 A. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 180 A” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 180 A” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2005–2008 | 2009–2011 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Agco DT-180 A has 21% more hydraulic flow (24.9 L/min / 6.6 gpm) than the Agco RT 180 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Agco DT-180 A is 14% heavier (1,110 kg / 2,447 lb) than the Agco RT 180 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on gears: every machine is stepless.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the RT 180 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources