Agco DT-160 or Lamborghini 165 Racing?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 165 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Agco DT-160 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 103% (59.1 L/min / 15.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco DT-160 and Lamborghini 165 Racing, with the call on each
QuestionDT-160165 RacingCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?119.2 kW (159.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160”119.9 kW (160.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 165 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-160 and the 165 Racing.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-160 and the 165 Racing.
Which pumps more oil for implements?116.6 L/min (30.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160”57.5 L/min (15.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”AheadThe Agco DT-160 has 103% more hydraulic flow (59.1 L/min / 15.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini 165 Racing (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,300 kg (16,094 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160”8,600 kg (18,960 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the DT-160: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160”); the 165 Racing: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?8,623 kg (19,010 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160”5,830 kg (12,853 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-160 is 48% heavier (2,793 kg / 6,158 lb) than the Lamborghini 165 Racing (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the DT-160.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160”27Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”AheadThe Lamborghini 165 Racing has 50% more forward gears (9 gears) than the Agco DT-160 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-160 and the 165 Racing.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2002–20041991–2001Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-160 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco DT-160 has 103% more hydraulic flow (59.1 L/min / 15.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini 165 Racing (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco DT-160 is 48% heavier (2,793 kg / 6,158 lb) than the Lamborghini 165 Racing (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Lamborghini 165 Racing has 50% more forward gears (9 gears) than the Agco DT-160 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco DT-160 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 165 Racing has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the DT-160: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160”); the 165 Racing: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 165 DT A Racing”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources