AGCO-ALLIS 9815 or WHITE 6215?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9815 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6215 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9815 | 6215 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 160.3 kW (215.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 160.3 kW (215.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6215” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9815 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6215 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9815 and the 6215. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9815 and the 6215. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 105.2 L/min (27.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 103.3 L/min (27.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6215” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,560 kg (16,667 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 7,556 kg (16,658 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 6215” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,894 kg (19,608 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 7,847 kg (17,300 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 6215” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 9815 is 13% heavier (1,047 kg / 2,308 lb) than the WHITE 6215 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9815 and the 6215. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “White 6215” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9815 and the 6215. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6215” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6215” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6215” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “White 6215”; Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6215” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–1998 | 1994–1999 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9815 is 13% heavier (1,047 kg / 2,308 lb) than the WHITE 6215 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on three-point lift (both lift 610 mm behind the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9815 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6215 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources