AGCO-ALLIS 9815 or Fendt Favorit 622 LS?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9815 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 622 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9815 | Favorit 622 LS | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 160.3 kW (215.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 155 kW (208 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 622 LS/LSA” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9815 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 622 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9815 and the Favorit 622 LS. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9815 and the Favorit 622 LS. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 105.2 L/min (27.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Favorit 622 LS. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,948 kg (13,113 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 8,260 kg (18,210 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 622 LS/LSA” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 9815: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815”); the Favorit 622 LS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 622 LS/LSA”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,894 kg (19,608 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 9,575 kg (21,109 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 622 LS/LSA” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 11,540 kg (25,441 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 622 LS/LSA” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9815. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | — | No figureNo call on forward gears: no figure on record for the Favorit 622 LS. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9815 and the Favorit 622 LS. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 39.0 km/h (24.2 mph) to 39.5 km/h (24.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 622 LS/LSA” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 622 LS/LSA” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 622 LS. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 622 LS/LSA” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–1998 | 1979–1982 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 9815 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9815 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9815 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 622 LS has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 9815: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9815”); the Favorit 622 LS: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 622 LS/LSA”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, forward gears, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources