AGCO-ALLIS 9785 vs Fendt 927 Vario
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the 9785 and the 927 Vario → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | 9785 | 927 Vario | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 227.8 hp | 236 hp | — |
| Engine declared | INTERNATIONAL-NAVISTAR DTA-530 | — | — |
| Maximum torque declared | 677 lb·ft · 918 N·m | 811 lb·ft · 1,100 N·m | +20% 927 Vario |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 18.6–24.9 mph · 30–40 km/h | 31.1–37.3 mph · 50–60 km/h | differs |
| Clutch declared | Oil-cooled wet multi-plate clutch | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Hydraulic centre declared | Closed centre | — | — |
| Hydraulic control declared | — | Load sensing | — |
| Pressure declared | 3,046 psi · 210 bar | — | — |
| Three-point lift at ends declared | 19,709 lb · 8,940 kg | 26,455 lb · 12,000 kg | +34% 927 Vario |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 1000 rpm | 540/1000 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 18,801 lb · 8,528 kg | 22,223 lb · 10,080 kg | +18% 927 Vario |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | — | 39,683 lb · 18,000 kg | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 112.5 in · 2,858 mm | 120.1 in · 3,050 mm | +7% 927 Vario |
| Length declared | 203.0 in · 5,156 mm | 222.6 in · 5,655 mm | +10% 927 Vario |
| Width declared | 98.2 in · 2,494 mm | 108.3 in · 2,750 mm | +10% 927 Vario |
| Height declared | 121.0 in · 3,073 mm | 130.8 in · 3,322 mm | +8% 927 Vario |
| Ground clearance declared | 17.5 in · 445 mm | 20.1 in · 510 mm | +15% 927 Vario |
| Fuel tank declared | 479.7 qt · 454.0 L | 697.4 qt · 660 L | +45% 927 Vario |
AGCO-ALLIS 9785 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9785”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9775”
Fendt 927 Vario sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt 927 Vario”
- Source: OECD test report 2544, 2010