AGCO-ALLIS 9775 or Fendt Favorit 822 LSE?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 822 LSE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9775 | Favorit 822 LSE | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 152.2 kW (204.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9775” | 154 kW (207 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 822 LSE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9775 and the Favorit 822 LSE. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9775 and the Favorit 822 LSE. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | — | 104.4 L/min (27.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 9775. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 8,940 kg (19,709 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9775” | 9,180 kg (20,238 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 9775: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9775”); the Favorit 822 LSE: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,521 kg (18,786 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9775” | 7,690 kg (16,954 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 9775 is 11% heavier (831 kg / 1,832 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 822 LSE (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 12,000 kg (26,455 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9775. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9775” | 44Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9775. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9775” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9775” | 750 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | AheadThe Fendt Favorit 822 LSE offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9775 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9775 and the Favorit 822 LSE. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9775” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–2001 | 1993–2004 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 9775 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9775 is 11% heavier (831 kg / 1,832 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 822 LSE (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Favorit 822 LSE offers 750 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9775 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9775 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 822 LSE has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 9775: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9775”); the Favorit 822 LSE: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 822”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources