AGCO-ALLIS 9765 or Agco RT-155 A?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9765 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the RT-155 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The AGCO-ALLIS 9765 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 42% (2,628 kg / 5,794 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGCO-ALLIS 9765 and Agco RT-155 A, with the call on each
Question9765RT-155 ACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?136.1 kW (182.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9765”133.9 kW (179.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 155 A”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9765 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the RT-155 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9765 and the RT-155 A.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9765 and the RT-155 A.
Which pumps more oil for implements?115.6 L/min (30.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 155 A”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 9765.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,940 kg (19,709 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9765”6,312 kg (13,916 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 155 A”AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 9765 has 42% more lift (2,628 kg / 5,794 lb) than the Agco RT-155 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?7,802 kg (17,200 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9765”7,645 kg (16,854 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 155 A”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9765 and the RT-155 A.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 36 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9765”Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 155 A”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the AGCO-ALLIS 9765 has 18 to 36 forward gears and the Agco RT-155 A is stepless (CVT) — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9765 and the RT-155 A.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9765”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 155 A”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9765”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 155 A”AheadThe Agco RT-155 A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9765 does not (as stated by the sources).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 155 A”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9765.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9765”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 155 A”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20012006–2011Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-155 A is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The AGCO-ALLIS 9765 has 42% more lift (2,628 kg / 5,794 lb) than the Agco RT-155 A (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco RT-155 A offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9765 does not (as stated by the sources).
  • The Agco RT-155 A is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the AGCO-ALLIS 9765 has 18 to 36 forward gears and the Agco RT-155 A is stepless (CVT) — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9765 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the RT-155 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources