AGCO-ALLIS 9745 or Case-Steyr 9145 a?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9745 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9145 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The AGCO-ALLIS 9745 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 64% (43.7 L/min / 11.5 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGCO-ALLIS 9745 and Case-Steyr 9145 a, with the call on each
Question97459145 aCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?108.1 kW (145.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9745”106.7 kW (143.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9145”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9745 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9145 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?——No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9745 and the 9145 a.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?——No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9745 and the 9145 a.
Which pumps more oil for implements?112.4 L/min (29.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9745”68.7 L/min (18.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9145”AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 9745 has 64% more hydraulic flow (43.7 L/min / 11.5 gpm) than the Case-Steyr 9145a (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?6,695 kg (14,760 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9745”7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9145”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,863 kg (15,130 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9745”5,285 kg (11,651 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9145”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 9745 is 30% heavier (1,578 kg / 3,479 lb) than the Case-Steyr 9145a (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?—9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9145”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9745.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 32Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9745”20 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9145”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?——No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9745 and the 9145 a.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9745”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9145”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9745”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9145”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?——No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9745 and the 9145 a.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9745”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9145”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20011995–2003EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The AGCO-ALLIS 9745 has 64% more hydraulic flow (43.7 L/min / 11.5 gpm) than the Case-Steyr 9145a (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The AGCO-ALLIS 9745 is 30% heavier (1,578 kg / 3,479 lb) than the Case-Steyr 9145a (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9745 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9145 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources