AGCO-ALLIS 9690 or Hürlimann H-6200 Turbo?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9690 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-6200 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9690 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 27% (17.5 L/min / 4.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9690 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9690 | H-6200 Turbo | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 145.6 kW (195.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 147.2 kW (197.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6200 A” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9690 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-6200 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9690 and the H-6200 Turbo. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9690 and the H-6200 Turbo. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 82.5 L/min (21.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 65.0 L/min (17.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6200 A” | AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 9690 has 27% more hydraulic flow (17.5 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-6200 Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,707 kg (8,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 6,000 kg (13,228 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6200 A” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the 9690: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690”); the H-6200 Turbo: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6200 A”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,210 kg (18,100 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6200 A” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6200 A” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9690. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 36Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6200 A” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-6200 Turbo has 100% more forward gears (18 gears) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9690 and the H-6200 Turbo. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6200 A” | AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 9690 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Hürlimann H-6200 Turbo (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6200 A” | AheadThe Hürlimann H-6200 Turbo offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-6200 Turbo. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6200 A” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–1995 | 1982 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 9690 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9690 has 27% more hydraulic flow (17.5 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-6200 Turbo (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-6200 Turbo has 100% more forward gears (18 gears) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9690 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Hürlimann H-6200 Turbo (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Hürlimann H-6200 Turbo offers 540 rpm at the PTO, which the AGCO-ALLIS 9690 does not (as stated by the sources).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9690 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9690 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the H-6200 Turbo has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the 9690: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9690”); the H-6200 Turbo: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 6200 A”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources