AGCO-ALLIS 9675 or WHITE 6175?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6175 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The AGCO-ALLIS 9675 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 33% (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGCO-ALLIS 9675 and WHITE 6175, with the call on each
Question96756175Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?130.2 kW (174.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”128.7 kW (172.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6175”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6175 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9675 and the 6175.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9675 and the 6175.
Which pumps more oil for implements?106.4 L/min (28.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”79.9 L/min (21.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “White 6175”AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 9675 has 33% more hydraulic flow (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the WHITE 6175 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,866 kg (6,318 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”2,997 kg (6,607 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6175”EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which is heavier, for traction?6,604 kg (14,559 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”6,713 kg (14,800 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6175”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9675 and the 6175.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6175”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9675 and the 6175.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6175”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 6175”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-White 6175”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675”Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 6175”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1994–19981993–1999EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The AGCO-ALLIS 9675 has 33% more hydraulic flow (26.5 L/min / 7.0 gpm) than the WHITE 6175 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6175 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources