AGCO-ALLIS 9675 or Ford TW-30 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TW-30 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Ford TW-30 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 54% (1,544 kg / 3,404 lb) more three-point lift.
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9675 suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9675 | TW-30 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 130.2 kW (174.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 130.2 kW (174.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TW-30 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9675 and the TW-30 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9675 and the TW-30 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 106.4 L/min (28.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the TW-30 (A). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,866 kg (6,318 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 4,410 kg (9,722 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | AheadThe Ford TW-30 (A) has 54% more lift (1,544 kg / 3,404 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 6,604 kg (14,559 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 6,634 kg (14,625 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,990 kg (19,820 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9675. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 14Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 9675 has 29% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Ford TW-30 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9675 and the TW-30 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 9675 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Ford TW-30 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9675” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Ford TW 30” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–1998 | 1979–1983 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 9675 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Ford TW-30 (A) has 54% more lift (1,544 kg / 3,404 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9675 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9675 has 29% more forward gears (4 gears) than the Ford TW-30 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9675 has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the Ford TW-30 (A) (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9675 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9675 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TW-30 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources