AGCO-ALLIS 9655 or Massey Ferguson MF 8130 A?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 9655 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 8130 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 9655 | MF 8130 A | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 115.5 kW (154.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655” | 114.1 kW (153.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8130” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9655 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 8130 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 9655 and the MF 8130 A. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 9655 and the MF 8130 A. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 77.6 L/min (20.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655” | 53.3 L/min (14.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8130” | AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 9655 has 46% more hydraulic flow (24.3 L/min / 6.4 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8130 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,682 kg (5,913 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655” | 5,640 kg (12,434 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8130” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8130 A has 110% more lift (2,958 kg / 6,521 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9655 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 7,350 kg (16,204 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655” | 5,680 kg (12,522 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8130” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 9655 is 29% heavier (1,670 kg / 3,682 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8130 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8130” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 9655. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655” | 32 to 48Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8130” | AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 8130 A has 78% more forward gears (14 gears) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9655 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 9655 and the MF 8130 A. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8130” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8130” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8130” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 9655” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 8130” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1994–1998 | 1995–1999 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9655 has 46% more hydraulic flow (24.3 L/min / 6.4 gpm) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8130 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 8130 A has 110% more lift (2,958 kg / 6,521 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9655 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 9655 is 29% heavier (1,670 kg / 3,682 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 8130 A (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Massey Ferguson MF 8130 A has 78% more forward gears (14 gears) than the AGCO-ALLIS 9655 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 9655 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 8130 A has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources