AGCO-ALLIS 8775 or Case-IH JX 95 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the JX 95 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The AGCO-ALLIS 8775 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 150% (67.6 L/min / 17.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 8775 | JX 95 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 70.6 kW (94.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8775” | 70.6 kW (94.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the JX 95 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8775 and the JX 95 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8775 and the JX 95 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 112.8 L/min (29.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8775” | 45.2 L/min (11.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 8775 has 150% more hydraulic flow (67.6 L/min / 17.9 gpm) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,339 kg (7,361 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8775” | 3,565 kg (7,859 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | EvenEven on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,245 kg (9,359 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8775” | 3,080 kg (6,790 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 8775 is 38% heavier (1,165 kg / 2,568 lb) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8775 and the JX 95 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 32Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8775” | 12 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 8775 has 60% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8775 and the JX 95 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8775” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8775” | 540E/540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 8775 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH JX 95 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8775” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8775” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH JX95” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–1999 | 2002–2004 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The AGCO-ALLIS 8775 has 150% more hydraulic flow (67.6 L/min / 17.9 gpm) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 8775 is 38% heavier (1,165 kg / 2,568 lb) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 8775 has 60% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Case-IH JX 95 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 8775 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the Case-IH JX 95 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- Even on three-point lift (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8775 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the JX 95 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources